Engineers need to start thinking now about how to cater for a new wave of transportation that’s coming to Australia’s roads: autonomous cars.
National Road Safety Week, which started on Monday, serves as a reminder that not only are safer roads needed now, but that infrastructure designers must adopt a proactive approach to safety.
One technology that drives this point home is the autonomous vehicle (AV). Although it will still be some time until AVs are par for the course on our roads, we can start planning now for what is a near-future inevitability.
Shifting from driver to autonomous operation
There will be an extended transitional phase from driver-operated to computer-operated vehicles, and we are in this transitional phase now. New cars already include in-built safety features that allow the car to take over if danger is detected, such as emergency braking, weave-lane control and speed limiters.
But on roads in which both human-driven cars and AVs will interact, conflict will be likely. Until we fully transition to an autonomous fleet, road design — especially major highways — might require AV-only lanes and a mixture of other road layout models that accommodate a new driving regime.
This presents an array of new challenges for engineers of the future who are committed to delivering roads that are safe for both humans and their AVs.
Since the dawn of the motorcar, a large body of design manuals, guidelines and templates have been progressively developed to support efficient and safe traffic operations. The form of road infrastructure has always needed to comply with exacting and robust design criteria.
But as the size, speed and number of vehicles have increased over time, so too have the design criteria. They have continuously been updated and supported by the research and learnings of recorded traffic operations.
As this road space has become increasingly shared with more vulnerable users such as pedestrians and cyclists, road design has been amended to increase the safety of these users.
The basic premise of these design guidelines is to inform or coerce driver behaviours or reduce the effects of an accident. Human error is identified as the cause of 90 per cent of accidents despite the design measures.
AVs, theoretically, should remove the human-driver behaviours element, and replace human error with a computer-based, system-wide approach that interacts with other road users.
This environment could remove the need for much of the operational and safety design measures previously required in engineers’ designs. Would a fully autonomous vehicle need lanes, signage and traffic lights, parking bays or crash barriers?
Considering the rate of change across multiple sectors, there is also a high risk of building redundant infrastructure. Today’s road design requirements involve complicated and costly design features based on the human-driven car.
The life cycle of this infrastructure is at least 20 to 30 years and risks becoming redundant when an AV fleet requires road space. Road design will therefore need to be flexible to allow for relatively simple augmentation to support AVs.
Another factor to consider is the growing influence of the private sector on the construction and operation of road infrastructure — toll roads, for example. Coming from a more commercial and responsive business model, the private sector is more likely to quickly move to an AV-based design model. This could lead to a two-level road system: one based on fee-paying AVs, the other a free but mixed-vehicle type.
Road infrastructure design could become a blank canvas where geometry and connectivity are the design criteria.
Engineers: seasoned change managers
Engineers are not immune to the pressures of radical change. As the market demand for autonomous vehicles and digital disruption continues, we will have to adapt our skills accordingly.
New technologies will continue to develop at an increasing rate and disruption will persist. The processes inherent in digital engineering are continuously evolving and it is our job to not only keep up but get ahead.
That said, it is equally as important to remember that the fundamentals of engineering will always prevail. The best solutions in the future will be derived from the augmentation of humans and machines because the building blocks of engineering are enhanced by technology.
Infrastructure designers who are willing to re-tool and embrace new ideas are best placed to support and deliver change. The need for change is not a new concept; in fact, it is something most engineers are all too familiar with.
Engineers have been doing this for thousands of years — from the Roman days of building roads for horse and cart and marching armies, to smoother surfaces for a fragile small Model T Ford, to designing 20-lane superhighways that can carry a 50 ton, 75 m long truck.
For engineers, change is a constant. What we face now is merely a new and exciting evolutionary stage.
